Joe Clay

Month

June 2011

3 posts

Design is Important

I’ve gotten into a bit of discussion over at macrumors over what a few people deem to be a trivial matter. Someone began a thread discussing the texture used on the left iPhone below.

This is the texture used in the folders in iOS and on the back of Dashboard widgets in Mac OS. In short, it’s hideous, and it looks like it took all of two minutes to make in Photoshop. And now it’s everywhere.

And on the right is a design Teehan+Lax made almost two years ago. Look how clean and sleek it is, and how they’ve thought of how to display everything. This was before Apple decided on the top down swipe to bring it up. Their version assumed a home screen next to the app screens like the search feature. Brilliant. Easy. Beautiful.

Instead, we’re going to have something more akin the what’s on the left. It’s disgusting.

The argument got me thinking about how non-designers think about design. One person in particular said that it was a silly thing to complain about and that he thinks that some people would be satisfied with a bag of dog crap if the bag looked “pretty.”

At that point, other than being annoyed because his view basically belittles my profession, I realized how little people actually understand design, art, and their importance to modern civilization. Keep in mind that we’re not just talking about posters and paintings. The chair you’re sitting in while reading this was designed by someone who spent time thinking about how you’re going to use what they create.

Design and function go hand in hand. Good design gives you clues about how to use something. Take Apple again as an example. The original iPod entered a crowded MP3 player market and took it over within a few years at a time when Apple was basically a joke in the market. Why? It was easy as hell to just pick up and use. Using the wheel was obvious. Using the center button for selection was a no-brainer. Navigating the menus was easy. In a few seconds you were listening to a song. It looked great. It’s design not only drew you in, but it also taught you how to use it.

Would you believe that a lot of the times you end up looking stupid while using something as simple as a door are related to failures of design? The next time you go shopping at a mall, notice that most exterior doors have a long vertical bar on the outside. You don’t need a sign to tell you to pull it. That’s what you naturally do. You naturally push doors that have a flat panel. Most doors in retail areas use both. However some doors are unidirectional and have bars on both sides. You pull it, but it turns out you were supposed to push it. You look like an idiot and it’s not your fault. The door was poorly designed. Good design sucks you in and makes how things work apparent.

Design can also be purely aesthetic. You may think you don’t give a shit about design, but that’s not the case. You may not care about the specifics like a designer does, but you do care. You just don’t realize it. Did you debate about what color of car to buy? Is your house only painted white on every surface? Are your appliances all red? Are all of your shirts the same? Do you only care about price when buying clothes? Do you have a favorite color?

Design can be a thankless profession. Hardly anyone notices good design and I guess that’s how it should be. But realize this: there’s a reason that Apple, Target, Starbucks, Anthropologie, Urban Outfitters, Fossil, etc. spend millions of dollars on design. There are people that care about how you interact with things more deeply than you’ll ever know. There are people that agonize over how your toothbrush fits in your hand, or what your coffee cup looks like. We’re just trying to make the world a better place for all of us because design solves problems. Design makes things easier.

Let’s get back to the “linen” texture. It’s ugly, appears cheap, and it hurts legibility. Is that a huge deal? No, not for the few people that like that look. For the others it makes the entire experience feel ugly, cheap, and difficult. How can it possibly have that affect? Design is subtle.

The next time you go to Target pay attention to what the experience is like. The next time you go to Wal Mart do the same thing. The lighting in Target is much better and the aisles are free of clutter. People go through every day and every night to put things back and straighten up the aisles—I know because I worked there during college. Wal Mart doesn’t do that. They put things back, but they don’t straighten them up. They clutter the aisles with items still in boxes. Target has rules against that. Wal Mart’s lighting is poor and the aisles are high. The whole experience feels like you’re in a dank warehouse and the mess becomes aggravating. Target feels like you’re in a store. It’s easy to shop there. It’s clean—and not in the alcohol sort of way.

I noticed that people don’t understand what “clean” means in terms of design. Teehan+Lax’s design is clean. It’s minimal. It’s not textured and it’s not cluttered. It makes excellent use of white space—which helps you feel less overwhelmed by information. It’s classy because it’s simple. People also seem to equate complicated textures with “classy” as if it cost money to make it. Unfortunately, they’re wrong. The Apple design is cluttered—not clean—simply by using that texture. And it’s not a particularly high end texture.

I went back and made my own version of Teehan+Lax’s notifications screen. I left the title bar at the bottom so that the user knows how to close the window once they’ve opened it. The screen slides in attached to the bar. The clock is large so that you can easily remind yourself of the time with a quick glance when looking at missed calls and text messages. And to appease those who won’t find it “classy” or “clean” without a texture, I added a texture that actually is classy and happens to work well with brushed metals and chrome—leather.

Don’t forget, design is important and design is everywhere. I hope I helped you see that a bit clearer.

Jun 29, 2011
College isn't Supposed to be for Everyone

I read an article that @norcross posted last week by Larry Sanger called “Is There a New Geek Anti-intellectualism?”. He posits that recently geeks have been coming off as anti-intellectual. Perhaps they have. I’ve heard people say a few of the things he mentions. However, I like to think that they are not anti-intellectual but anti-institutional in some cases, and rightly so.

I despise the recent mantra—since the 1980s at least—that everyone should be able to go to college. Wait, that’s not true. I totally believe in that statement. What I really disagree with is how that sentiment has been reinterpreted to mean that everyone should go to college.

College shouldn’t be for everyone. Not everyone wants to go or needs to go to college. Most students aren’t going for themselves. They are going to appease others—family, society, their peers, etc. The United States should adopt a more European view with respect to education. Europe is far more focused on figuring out who would excel in and enjoy college and who would excel in and enjoy trade programs.

That would raise the overall quality of higher education and it would make sure that aid would be available to students who need it and deserve it. Students would be there because they actually want to be there. Students that don’t really want to be there lower the education for those who want to be there. In my experience, at least half of the people at my university did not belong there and didn’t want to be there. They slept in, missed class frequently, interrupted the class by arriving late, asked questions that had been addressed, and just didn’t pay attention or express a desire to learn—which is the raison d’être for higher education.

Realize I’m not being elitist. I wish that everyone who wants to go to college could go. The thing is, those people usually find a way. The problem is when people who don’t want to go, and who would benefit and excel in a trade school program, go into college and perform poorly. Some people are brilliant theoretical physicists, and some people are automotive geniuses. the latter won’t excel in college but they’ll kill it in a trade school. Do what you like. If you can get there without college, do it. You’ll save time, money, and ultimately you’ll be happier doing and succeeding at what you love. And you won’t be stealing financial aid and scholarships from those who really need it to go to college in order to learn.

Jun 21, 20111 note
#education #internet #society
Consideration and Personal Responsibility

These two things have seemingly gone out the window. I’m sure that it’s probably always been the case, or has seemed that way to each successive generation, but I’m going to talk about it as it pertains to this point in time. Let me preface this by saying that though this topic is usually broached by the elderly, I’m 27.

I’ve been thinking about this for a while and last night I saw an article on my twitter stream that made me very happy. This stupid bitch—this is the most apt term—left a retarded voice mail for a theater that threw her out for texting while the movie was playing. This policy is fairly obvious and repeated multiple times during the pre-show. The theater went one better and made her voice mail into one of their custom no talking, no texting PSAs! And as an aside, calling the United States of America, Magnited States of America should have got her thrown out of the country too.

In the comments, the majority of people clearly sided with the theatre. But, as it goes with the internet, there were a few that wondered what the big deal is with texting during a movie. The big deal is that it’s an annoyance to everyone around you. And the bright fucking light from cell phones distracts everyone behind you too. If you text during a movie, you’re a fucking asshole. Read that again. You’re a fucking asshole. If the movie is that unimportant to you, why can’t you just get your ass up and walk the fuck out? Return when you can put on your big kid pants and control your impulses. Whether that’s the same day or fifteen years later, I don’t really care.

Your are allowed to do what you want in this country, but you shouldn’t do what you want at the expense of other people. There are plenty examples of this. I routinely speed on the interstate and yet I still get people who tailgate the hell out of me when there’s an open lane. Why be an asshole? Just drive around if you want to go faster. I don’t go out of my way to block you in—unless you’re a dick and you tailgate me for no reason. If I am blocking someone in and they’re not on my ass and I can move over I do. The same thing applies to people who are going under the speed limit or people who cut in front of you to go much slower than you are. Why can’t you just get out of the way or wait until I pass by and get behind me?

It’s fine to have your radio up full blast—when you’re driving down a highway. Turn your shitty music down when you drive through a neighborhood—especially if it’s dark outside. No one wants to hear what you’re listening to, and no one gives a shit about it either. Last week some idiot drove down my street at four in the fucking morning with his bass so loud that I could hear it coming for a minute before it passed by. Why do you have to be such a fucking dick? And haven’t you ever realized that excessive bass ruins music!? There used to be someone that drove by blaring shitty country music too. The only thing that gives me solace is the fact that all of those people will be deaf eventually.

If you’re old enough to drive you should be old enough to realize that there are other people on the planet besides you. Unfortunately, that’s the root of the problem. People are self-centered by nature, and now we have a society that embraces it. You may not have even noticed that being entitled has been embraced but we do and it starts with school.

It used to be that if you got in trouble you were punished. It used to be expected that you did what you were told to do without complaint. It used to be expected that you would figure out the answers yourself and no one dreamed of asking for answers from the teacher until they attempted the work. It used to be that if you did something bad you could be publicly embarrassed so that you wouldn’t do it again. Eventually you would learn personal responsibility.

These days that doesn’t exist. Teachers aren’t really allowed to punish. Teachers aren’t allowed to humiliate anyone—within reason of course, like reading a passed note aloud. Hell, teachers aren’t really even allowed to fail kids that should be failed. They can’t easily give them zeroes on homework or quizzes. And why is that? Legislation—no child left behind—and parental complaints. Everyone wants to think that their little kid is a darling and the teacher just hates their kid. That’s rarely the case. Some kids need to be left behind. Some kids need to be allowed to fail.

Where else does this happen? Banks, big mortgage lenders, and General Motors were all too big to fail. Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, etc are there to help you. What’s the motto in this? Fuck up and the government/someone else has your back. It’s not up to you to determine whether you succeed or fail. It’s up to someone else to catch you. I say, drop them. A good fall teaches you. If you don’t make mistakes, you don’t learn. If you’re not forced to think, you’ll never be considerate or responsible.

Jun 8, 20112 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April 3
  • May 1
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 1
  • February
  • March 3
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May 6
  • June 3
  • July 1
  • August 1
  • September 4
  • October 2
  • November
  • December